4 ms·
It isn't worth responding to secondary points if the primary point of discussion has devolved into non-sequiturs. It would be a distraction from the important p
by dwaltrip 6y ago
It isn't worth responding to secondary points if the primary point of discussion has devolved into non-sequiturs. It would be a distraction from the important parts.
- Fjolsvith 6y agoI fail to see your assertion that the other points are non-sequitor. OP states: > And the oceanic cycles absolutely dominate climate change. And then goes on to provide you studies about oceanic cycles that stand unchallenged.
- dwaltrip 6y ago100,000 year climate cycles are not what anyone was referring to in earlier comments when they said “climate change”. We are talking about the changes over the recent centuries which have been driven by co2 emissions. It was a misleading change of topic.