3 ms·

Again, I did not state "WebBundles = a blackbox". That is your misinterpretation of my comment which I took the time to clarify: "I am hardly claiming any one

Again, I did not state "WebBundles = a blackbox". That is your misinterpretation of my comment which I took the time to clarify: "I am hardly claiming any one initiative takes us straight there [to a black box of the web]". I was extremely clear on that, and further explained that we must consider Google's pattern of behaviour and commercial interests here – not one specific action. Ignoring my good-faith clarification you seemingly continue to suffer this misconception – that I asserted something I didn't ("back up your description of WebBundles as a black box"). You may be more interested in engaging with and refuting arguments based on a convenient misconception, but I really am not. For anyone seriously interested in this topic from the perspective of the open web and content blocking, the blog author summarised his concerns in a Github ticket [1]. (The responses throughout the Github issue reflect a similar strategy of a 'fingers-in-the-ears, everything is fine, what are you talking about' approach) [1] https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/551#issuecomment-618776153 https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/issues/551#issuecomment-6...

rektide 6y ago
You've held to a strongly combative & in my opinion fairly arrogant/dismissive close minded outlook in the dozens of comments you've posted in this thread. It's frustrating having to cope with such a lopsided one-dimensional perspective that injects itself everywhere. I feel like you have overrun & dominated every single thing anyone else has offered. I see that you think this is a bad spec, but you don't seem to acknowledge comprehend or grasp that a lot of people want this for really good & wholesome reasons. Signed exchanges for instance are absolutely critical in allowing users to share content with each other while offline, which has radical & excellent potential.
- justsee 6y ago
  It looks like you've responded to the wrong thread. (I posted one comment on this article, and a few follow-up comments to people who engaged with it.)

rektide 6y ago

You've held to a strongly combative & in my opinion fairly arrogant/dismissive close minded outlook in the dozens of comments you've posted in this thread. It's frustrating having to cope with such a lopsided one-dimensional perspective that injects itself everywhere. I feel like you have overrun & dominated every single thing anyone else has offered. I see that you think this is a bad spec, but you don't seem to acknowledge comprehend or grasp that a lot of people want this for really good & wholesome reasons. Signed exchanges for instance are absolutely critical in allowing users to share content with each other while offline, which has radical & excellent potential.

justsee 6y ago
It looks like you've responded to the wrong thread. (I posted one comment on this article, and a few follow-up comments to people who engaged with it.)