5 ms·

It's a limited unsatisfying list for me. Allowing only extensions monitored by Mozilla is against the great free internet spirit that Mozilla was functioning u

• ifmpx 6y ago
  > If I want only monitored stuff I may as well switch to Google... I was thinking this to myself. I use firefox on android because I have a set of addons that I refuse to browse the web without. If firefox can't run the addons I want, I might as well switch to the builtin browser instead.
  • anonymousab 6y ago
    Mozilla seems to be banking on "a freer/opener web" being a convincing selling point on its own. But at that point, they might as well just rebadge chromium like all the others. Corralling power users into a separate app version ala Nightly now comes across as a vain attempt at creating a longterm offramp to avoid backlash. It really makes you think "what's the point?" about it all.
  • vlod 6y ago
    Well the built in browser is Chrome (on Android). Come back and let me know how that works. :) Maybe you've forgotten the cesspool that the web has become, with all the crappy adverts and popups. I'm just glad I can run ublock-origin, the rest I'll wait for a bit.
• vlod 6y ago
  >Allowing only extensions monitored by Mozilla is against the great free internet spirit that Mozilla was functioning under till now. I feel the same way.. I would suggest to a have a LITTLE patience. They'll most likely get more extensions going forwards or people will fix the ones you use.