4 ms·
I'm glad there are people in this world who can completely unironically and confidently write "Signifier’s digital immateriality draws on a deeply material past
by jeffrallen 6y ago
I'm glad there are people in this world who can completely unironically and confidently write "Signifier’s digital immateriality draws on a deeply material past. Acknowledging the processes and tools of digital form-making, I worked consciously with the computer to recast the lead, antimony, and tin of the 17th century Fell Types into ones and zeros."
I certainly couldn't!
- Luc 6y agoAfter skimming through most of the article that paragraph actually started to make some sense to me.
- lotyrin 6y agoI had the exact opposite experience. This thesis (and the introduction) made perfect sense to me but the following results, methods and rationales left me unconvinced and uninspired.
- earthboundkid 6y agoAnything that smart people spend a lifetime doing—programming, font making, engineering, woodworking, auto repair, painting (house and fine art)—has depths that look completely crazy to outsiders.
- enriquto 6y agoYou do not really need to be a smart person for that. Infinite depth is within everyone's reach! Cf. xkcd 1095[0] [0] https://xkcd.com/1095/ https://xkcd.com/1095/
- saghm 6y agoI expected https://xkcd.com/915/ https://xkcd.com/915/ before I clicked
- enriquto 6y agoThere's also the one about cast iron skillets, that has a similar atmosphere https://xkcd.com/1905/ https://xkcd.com/1905/ Curiously, the three numbers do not seem really independent.
- toper-centage 6y ago> Curiously, the three numbers do not seem really independent. Those numbers.. Can't be a coincidence.
- toper-centage 6y agoUnfortunately i couldn't find evidence of the pattern going any further or back (195, 591, 2195 etc).
- Koshkin 6y agoThis is the style in which Brian Greene wrote much of his Until the End of Time, here is just one example: "the position and the speed of a particle—that a classical physicist in the mold of Isaac Newton would adamantly claim can be specified with complete certainty but that a quantum physicist realizes are burdened by a quantum fuzziness that makes them uncertain."
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- arh68 6y agoThat paragraph was really something to parse. At first, I tried to read it. Then I realized it was probably some GPT-3 output. Then I realized it was probably some boilerplate lorem ipsum text. And then, I could read it.
- zorpner 6y agoWhat's the takeaway here supposed to be? That you understand the subject so deeply that no concrete or constructive content is necessary in your criticism? Because I take from your comment the exact opposite conclusion.