3 ms·
I think that's a somewhat valid criticism. However, everything the site claims is something that you can verify for yourself by simply clicking the links they o
by jdoliner 6y ago
I think that's a somewhat valid criticism.
However, everything the site claims is something that you can verify for yourself by simply clicking the links they offer. This doesn't account for studies that should be in this list, but aren't. I'd be interested in hearing about which studies those are.
I think given that Doctors such as Simone Gold are being fired simply for stating that there's scientific evidence that HCQ can treat Covid-19 it's somewhat expected that sites such as this will be done anonymously.
- lucd 6y agoWhere was Simone Gold fired from? If you look at her LinkedIn profile she is working as a concierge physician for 9 years, she worked as a congressional fellow.. never worked as an emergency physician. Claiming to have been fired is part of her whistle-blower narrative.. https://www.linkedin.com/in/simone-gold-md-jd-4636a87 https://www.linkedin.com/in/simone-gold-md-jd-4636a87 Only a fool or someone just looking for confirmation would take an anonymous sham of meta-analysis seriously.