3 ms·
Look, you're right. I base off 250 (10k yrs ago) and looking at current 415 and carelessly using an order of magnitude type phrasing. It's not up 100.0%. It's b
by throwaway5752 6y ago
Look, you're right. I base off 250 (10k yrs ago) and looking at current 415 and carelessly using an order of magnitude type phrasing. It's not up 100.0%. It's between 50-100% and on the lower end.
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoYeah, well, I've never been imprecise here on HN. Never rounded my data to an order of magnitude. Nope. Never. (I, ah, may have rounded toward zero a bit in this paragraph...) Now I feel like "Captain Nitpick" for my previous comment.
- throwaway5752 6y agoNo, I had to acknowledge you are right, and good for you for holding me to the higher standard! Particularly on this topic.