3 ms·
That's not the server's problem. As the server, they should not be inconvenienced for a problem caused by someone else. The users (which includes the bots) shou
by Eumithas5 6y ago
That's not the server's problem. As the server, they should not be inconvenienced for a problem caused by someone else. The users (which includes the bots) should pay the price.
- jacquesm 6y agoNo, the users do not include the bots. You have this backwards.
- EGreg 6y agoBot are most certainly users. How is the server going to tell the difference? https://continuations.com/post/180985743645/world-after-capital-bots-for-all-of-us https://continuations.com/post/180985743645/world-after-capi...
- bluGill 6y agoDo you want my business? I have gone elsewhere with my money instead of solving for crosswalks before
- ByteJockey 6y agoAnd that works very well for every website you pay to use. What percentage of websites that you use is that, exactly?
- bluGill 6y agoI booked a hotel room elsewhere just this weekend.
- ByteJockey 6y agoYou know? That's fair. I hadn't considered the kickback model that booking sites seem to use. That's fair. I think your solution would work for those.
- mrpigeonpants 6y agoFinally, someone willing to advocate for the voice of the server rather than the obstinate user!