3 ms·
This doesn't work that well in practice: - Humans can lie - Human memory is too fallible to serve as this verification, particularly for every detail - Small
by crystaln 6y ago
This doesn't work that well in practice:
- Humans can lie
- Human memory is too fallible to serve as this verification, particularly for every detail
- Small details with big impact can be changed in a verified speech without some people noticing
Of course if someone reliable records the actual speech, any copy can be checked against that. I'm not sure why human memory would be considered superior, as humans have poor memories and can lie.
- freeone3000 6y agoHow can you tell a true copy from a false copy? What makes one recording more true than the other, if you can only compare it against a reality which no longer exists (because it's in the past)?
- uHuge 6y agoI have a simple manufacturing tweak patent for the recorder devices on my table to do so.