2 ms·
This is the main point most people just refuse to accept out of blind religion: zfs was production stable 10 years ago and is production stable TODAY. With btr
by znpy 6y ago
This is the main point most people just refuse to accept out of blind religion: zfs was production stable 10 years ago and is production stable TODAY.
With btrfs you're still waiting for stuff to be properly implemented.
- danudey 6y ago> With btrfs you're still waiting for stuff to be properly implemented. Redhat gave up on waiting, and is removing btrfs as a supported option in RHEL. Mostly, I assume, because the btrfs team has yet to ship something anyone in enterprise would be comfortable betting their customers' data on.
- fomine3 6y agoRedHat is not "just waiting" company for core component but hiring maintainers and strongly contributing company if needed. it's happened on XFS adoption.
- freedomben 6y agoRedHat is actively working on Stratis too (which I'm excited for): https://stratis-storage.github.io/ https://stratis-storage.github.io/