3 ms·
The images returned on DuckDuckGo are, in general, really dodgy. While debugging a web-server of mine, I recently found that various constant strings of file se
by TheNorthman 6y ago
The images returned on DuckDuckGo are, in general, really dodgy. While debugging a web-server of mine, I recently found that various constant strings of file servers return similarly `dodgy' results, like for example "Index of /" [0].
[0]: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22Index+of+%2F%22&iax=images&ia=images https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22Index+of+%2F%22&iax=images&ia=i...
- im3w1l 6y agoSo this is a complete tangent, but one of the images was some photograph off a geocities archive site. The woman had red eyes. I realized I haven't seen that in years. Cameras sure have improved.
- noobermin 6y agois this region/area dependent? I just see pictures of people, nothing sexual if that's what you mean.
- TheNorthman 6y agoIt shouldn't be, perhaps you have `Safe Search' turned on? (It is by default)
- chills 6y agoIt is (used to be?) a pretty common google "hack" to put an intitle:"index.of" on a search to find sites serving files, usually mp3s. Of course once this was widespread enough, SEO spam sites starting including it in the generated clickbait sites.
- jtsiskin 6y agoWhat the hell?? What is the explanation for this?