3 ms·
I was with you until >entire meta-industry of cost management which I’m sure is a net loss. I am paid hourly and I have literally, in the past week, billed ~14
by joncrane 6y ago
I was with you until >entire meta-industry of cost management which I’m sure is a net loss.
I am paid hourly and I have literally, in the past week, billed ~14 hours to save ~$150,000 per month. We work for a client and we strive to make sure we're not spending more money in labor than we're saving in AWS costs. I don't know exactly the rate I'm billed at that the client sees, but I know for sure that on aggregate, aside from the actual productive work that I know adds value, I have justified every penny I've been paid in the last ~2 years through my cost savings work alone.
Maybe some folks overcharge or undersave, but I take exception to your comment that you're "sure is a net loss."
Edit: our monthly AWS spend is in the 7 figures. We go through cycles where our priorities change, but when we're in cost savings mode, we regularly discover cost savings measure that are a) implementable in double digit hours and b) save six figures per month.
- m0xte 6y agoI’m not saying that it doesn’t result in a saving but that the fact that industry has to exist to keep costs constrained is a net loss. Imagine if pricing was transparent, calculable and easy to rationalise the cost of a change. But it isn’t unless you pull a third party in.