4 ms·
That is assuming you trust Soviet stats on Chernobyl deaths. I’m acquainted with one of Russia’s chief oncologists, who was one of the primary physicians that
by wittyreference 6y ago
That is assuming you trust Soviet stats on Chernobyl deaths.
I’m acquainted with one of Russia’s chief oncologists, who was one of the primary physicians that dealt with the consequences of Chernobyl. She’s been quite clear that the number of people affected is both large and well-suppressed.
Of course, the very nature of “the state makes sure not to collect damaging statistics” means I can’t actually quantify the real harm done. For all I know, maybe it’s just equal to ‘two’ bad train wrecks.
- arethuza 6y agoUnder Stalin, statisticians who collected the "wrong" values were likely to come to a very nasty end - I imagine something like that leaves a lingering fear in any society/profession: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Census_(1937) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Census_(1937)