Given how vastly different WWI and WII were from their predecessors, I don't see planning for WWIII being a very useful exercise. The game theory is so vastly o

Given how vastly different WWI and WII were from their predecessors, I don't see planning for WWIII being a very useful exercise. The game theory is so vastly open ended, and capabilities of belligerents so great it Bogles the mind. (Oh, and I fail to see how China wouldn't win. Heh.) That just leaves "counter-insurgency" empire building crap which is super inefficient at even the stated goals, and the stated goals are worthless. Therefore I conclude the whole exercise is pointless and a waste of money.