3 ms·
If drone swarms might be a threat in the near future then it only makes sense that the capability to fight them needs to be developed now so you aren't scrambli
by waste_monk 6y ago
If drone swarms might be a threat in the near future then it only makes sense that the capability to fight them needs to be developed now so you aren't scrambling to R&D a response during wartime.
The way I see it, we're probably headed towards a cold (at minimum) war between sino-russia et. al. and the western allies, so (in the absence of something more effective) tactical nuclear weapons to counter aircraft swarms will become more tolerable as tensions continue to rise - far better to use one to take out a drone swarm and cause drama than risk losing an air wing (or something else that interferes with force projection). Hopefully I'm wrong though.
- blaser-waffle 6y agoThere is no circumstance where tactical nukes will be acceptable in a global conflict between nuclear powers. One nuke goes off and everyone will assume it's no-holds-barred. The potential to escalate to a full-on MAD scenario is just too high. If you can develop a drone swarm that can totally own an airspace then chances are you can develop drones that can beat them.