3 ms·
I sometimes ask on Usenet or on IRC. IRC messages may get lost (although they may also be answered more quickly if there are enough users); Usenet messages are
by zzo38computer 6y ago
I sometimes ask on Usenet or on IRC. IRC messages may get lost (although they may also be answered more quickly if there are enough users); Usenet messages are unlikely to get lost (although they may expire, someone will probably still have a copy, and in general you can still post a follow-up message to an expired article). But to try to more likely to get an answer, would be asking in more than one place, I suppose. (I think that audio/video would make it worse, though; text format would work better for these kind of things, I think.)
- non-entity 6y agoMy only issue with IRC is that if I don't have something always running to log messages, I'll lose anything as soon as I kill the client. Which means I could ask something at night, go to bed (I turn my PC off then) and never no if someone responded.
- zzo38computer 6y agoYes, if that the client does not itself automatically log messages, nor if the server does, or some log bot; some people say that IRC doesn't support server side logging, although actually it is the protocol which has no standardized way to access it, and an implementation easily can do so (you could mention the way to access it in MOTD maybe, or mention the relevant HELP topic in MOTD). (Private messages probably should not be logged by the server though, nor should messages on private channels or passworded channels, I think. Some implementations might only support logging for permanent channels anyways; I think I have once done that, but I lost it now.)
- joalavedra 6y agommh, I see your point. audio/video rooms could be messy is none is actually moderating the quality or the responses. What if somehow you could lock the capacity of those rooms to make it of high quality for your interactions?