3 ms·
Note the `C# .NET Core #5` and `Java #3` programs. Note the `C# .NET Core #4` and `Java #2` programs. https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarks
by igouy 6y ago
Note the `C# .NET Core #5` and `Java #3` programs.
Note the `C# .NET Core #4` and `Java #2` programs.
https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/performance/pidigits.html https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...
- zamalek 6y agoYes, C# is currently a more expressive language for performance than Java is, and can score much higher with tighter code. I wouldn't trust the opinion of someone who claims otherwise by ignoring the facts (as demonstrated by your link). The specific benchmarks in the OP are not objective and fair. I personally want nothing to do with Java, its glacial progress and Oracle's lawyers. But fair is fair. Using facts to prove a point (as you have) means that quality facts are needed. The OP is not quality facts.
- igouy 6y agoThe pidigits benchmark in the OP shows exactly the same facts that I posted.