> Interestingly, the objective was to bring back a green landscape without sacrificing urban density. Yeah, it was one way to do that, for sure. But there are

> Interestingly, the objective was to bring back a green landscape without sacrificing urban density. Yeah, it was one way to do that, for sure. But there are other ways that many people would think are far better. Here's a typical street in a neighborhood that is presently at about 30,000 people/mile^2 (11,000 people/km^2): https://www.google.com/maps/@42.0103594,-87.6643239,3a,75y,238.24h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sGHmLhAxFppoH4m9vIirLbA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DGHmLhAxFppoH4m9vIirLbA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D230.20157%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192 https://www.google.com/maps/@42.0103594,-87.6643239,3a,75y,2...