3 ms·
I disagree with the topic you think the piece is even about. The piece isn't about having a well thought out question at all. It's about not asking for permissi
by xboxnolifes 6y ago
I disagree with the topic you think the piece is even about. The piece isn't about having a well thought out question at all. It's about not asking for permission to ask the question. People don't want to say "sure, I'm around" and then 5-10 minutes later say "sorry, I don't have experience with that". They want people to ask a question to the best of their ability and if they think they can help they will.
The domain I'm thinking about in my example is tournament organizing. So many questions start off with.
> Can someone help me?
Or
> I have a question.
And want nothing else than a 'sure' or 'yes?' before asking their questions. But why not just ask the question / state the issue that is almost always already thought out as:
> I'm having an issue with registering my team.
Or
> Am I eligible to participate if X?
There was no long and thought out process of "logical and formalized" question forming here. It was just avoiding the waste of time between the asker having a question and getting an answer.
- jancsika 6y ago> People don't want to say "sure, I'm around" and then 5-10 minutes later say "sorry, I don't have experience with that". Yes, if only humans could outsource such desiderata to some kind of specialized "engine" that could produce human language sentence given a set of explicit data and instructions. Would this be the right forum to ask about how to design such an engine? Seriously asking because it doesn't look like anyone here has experience with solving such a novel problem.