> Williams’ case is a signal to stop the ad hoc adoption of facial recognition before an injustice occurs that cannot be undone.” Arguably, Williams' case is t

> Williams’ case is a signal to stop the ad hoc adoption of facial recognition before an injustice occurs that cannot be undone.” Arguably, Williams' case is that injustice. It should not have happened in the first place (although anyone in the field could have told you it would be inevitable). Clearly the machine-human interface is insufficent. A big honking warning is still insufficient to overcome automation bias (see other top level comment). Perhaps the "lineup" functionality needs to be baked in. The system won't divulge details until a(n) operator(s) selects hits from a pool.