2 ms·
From the article: > “The cops looked at each other. I heard one say that ‘the computer must have gotten it wrong.’” Williams learned that in investigating a th
by tehwebguy 6y ago
From the article:
> “The cops looked at each other. I heard one say that ‘the computer must have gotten it wrong.’” Williams learned that in investigating a theft from the store, a facial recognition system had tagged his driver’s license photo as matching the surveillance image. But the next steps, where investigators first confirm the match, then seek more evidence for an arrest, were poorly done and Williams was brought in. He had to spend 30 hours in jail and post a $1,000 bond before he was freed.
This article just explained that someone who was clearly not the right person was still arrested by human police officers and charged even though those very same human police realized it was the wrong person.
The police wouldn't have even shown up at this random person's house if it weren't for the technology. They were the failsafe, and they failed too.
- sdsvsdgggggg 6y agoThat's not the fault of the face recognition, though. And it would have happened in the same way if a human had misclassified the image. Do they propose nobody should ever look at images of suspects and try to identify them?