2 ms·
Courts basically have to follow a precedent or set a precedent. Setting a precedent is consequential. If this case results in setting a precedent that influence
by dqpb 6y ago
Courts basically have to follow a precedent or set a precedent. Setting a precedent is consequential. If this case results in setting a precedent that influences future international commerce, then it becomes a non-trivial deliberation. Being “partial to the US” might not be well defined in this case.