3 ms·
> You assume ROX was better than anything on the Linux desktop the time I don't assume, I know because I was there. > that assumption would be false. Rox didn
by AnIdiotOnTheNet 6y ago
> You assume ROX was better than anything on the Linux desktop the time
I don't assume, I know because I was there.
> that assumption would be false. Rox didn't do anything extraordinary or better than the desktops or window managers of the day.
Name a single modern Linux DE that supports drag-n-drop saving, or AppDirs.
An answer of "I don't use those features so therefore they aren't important" is not acceptable.