OK I see what you're getting at. But yea my concern has always been with the "existing" investment. So say I'm Comcast and I've invested $X millions into layin

OK I see what you're getting at. But yea my concern has always been with the "existing" investment. So say I'm Comcast and I've invested $X millions into laying infrastructure, it seems "unfair" to me to just come commandeer that investment in the name of net neutrality. Especially if you're going to expect me to further invest and/or maintain the existing. So I understand your perspective around expansion (e.g., limited/time exclusivity or a usage fee). But I still think the infrastructure cost (adding, maintaining, upgrading) is probably one of their larger costs? No?