Update: The source is this: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2020/01/copyright-notices-in-open-source-software-projects/ https://www.linuxfoundation.org/bl

Update: The source is this: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2020/01/copyright-notices-in-open-source-software-projects/ https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2020/01/copyright-notic... And there is some interesting stuff under : Why not list every copyright holder? It seems very strange to me that a lawyer writes this: The specific individual or legal entity that owns the copyright might not be known to the contributor; it could be you, your employer, or some other entity. He considers it acceptable to contribute even if the actual ownership is not clear. If you don't know who owns a contribution, how can the owner agree to contribute?