4 ms·
Sorry, maybe it is a wrong analogy. What I want to emphasize is that there is no calculating time in nature. At least, we could not feel "lag" in our "Nature Se
by LdSGSgvupDV 6y ago
Sorry, maybe it is a wrong analogy. What I want to emphasize is that there is no calculating time in nature. At least, we could not feel "lag" in our "Nature Server".
For the part of chips, did you mean that it runs the "for loop" as parallel in each micro-chip (or gate or whatever tiny structure it is)?
- sudosysgen 6y ago>Sorry, maybe it is a wrong analogy. What I want to emphasize is that there is no calculating time in nature. At least, we could not feel "lag" in our "Nature Server". Yes, but the reality is that there is lag in our projection of what nature is and that we just ignore it. Different parts of our perception actually don't exist at the same instant. >For the part of chips, did you mean that it runs the "for loop" as parallel in each micro-chip (or gate or whatever tiny structure it is)? Pretty much, the for-loop is unfolded and ran in parallel.