4 ms·
In the former case all the teenagers did was send in an RSVP indicating they would attend knowing full well they would not be doing so. In the later case forei
by jussij 6y ago
In the former case all the teenagers did was send in an RSVP indicating they would attend knowing full well they would not be doing so.
In the later case foreign entities were spreading misinformation in an attempt to undermine candidates, in they hope they could change the outcome of an election.
The later was a direct attack on the election process, the former was a direct attack on the president's ego.
- blfr 6y agoSending false RSVPs is exactly spreading misinformation to undermine a candidate by making his support seem smaller than it is through crowding out real potential participants. Don't get me wrong. I think it's pretty funny but I don't think this option is available to someone lamenting Facebook ads.