3 ms·

> You presented forum posts from random users as if they were from Spotify. ;) You said: if Spotify could charge more, they would. Spotify said: we did charge

> You presented forum posts from random users as if they were from Spotify. ;) You said: if Spotify could charge more, they would. Spotify said: we did charge more, and then we decided to stop doing it. Keep backflipping dude! > Wordpress didn't charge anything, it was to control Wordpress instances via their XML-API. Apple just thought "hey they link to some site to which you can buy stuff, lets force them to IAP". This right there is insanity. Literally nothing to do with our discussion which is about your bogus assertion that apps are forbidden from differential pricing. > Your own Spotify link. Unless you're illiterate (increasingly possible!), my Spotify link indicates that Spotify chose to stop differential pricing. Classic example of cognitive dissonance: ignoring Phil Schiller, the guy who is literally in charge of the app store, telling you that you are wrong ;) Oh dear mate.

gsich 6y ago
>Spotify said: we did charge more, and then we decided to stop doing it. Yes, because they couldn't charge more. People wouldn't accept it, so they blamed Spotify instead of Apple, because they weren't allowed to. Of course they can't do differential pricing if they aren't allowed to show that. >Literally nothing to do with our discussion which is about your bogus assertion that apps are forbidden from differential pricing. Well it is. In reverse of course, because Apple thought that they'd lose revenue. >Classic example of cognitive dissonance: ignoring Phil Schiller, the guy who is literally in charge of the app store, telling you that you are wrong ;) Also the guy who is responsible for that. Hey, Wordpress, Spotify, Netflix, Microft. They are all "wrong". He is the leader of the insane asylum.