It would be interesting to see the legal defense of what constitutes "knowingly" disrupting it. For example, if I put a zip bomb on all my emails regardless of

It would be interesting to see the legal defense of what constitutes "knowingly" disrupting it. For example, if I put a zip bomb on all my emails regardless of the border security but just as a general security measure, would that make me culpable if it wasn't targeted? All hypothetical of course, because there's other hurdles to that as well like being flagged as spam in every day use.