4 ms·
Shameless plug - I've been working on something similiar, but with a different aim. https://github.com/nmurray1984/porn-blocker-chrome-extension https://github
by ndm000 6y ago
Shameless plug - I've been working on something similiar, but with a different aim.
https://github.com/nmurray1984/porn-blocker-chrome-extension https://github.com/nmurray1984/porn-blocker-chrome-extension
I found that the hardest problem to solve was the prevanlence of false positives. Even if you have a low false positive rate, it's still very likely to have an image blocked regularly just due to volume.
For that reason, the focus of my plugin is - for users that are OK with it - contributing URLs that are not NSFW but have been blocked. The extension includes a right-click menu option to do so.
- antpls 6y agoAssuming you meant some SFW images are mistakenly blocked, it is an easier situation than with true negative. Once an image tested positive with your first model, you could run a second more CPU intensive model (but also more accurate) on it.
- wongarsu 6y agoAssuming you have a notably more accurate algorithm. It's a difficult problem even with infinite computing power.
- ndm000 6y agoGreat idea. MobileNetv2 is the model used currently due to it's small footprint (I used transfer learning on a dataset of NSFW and SFW images). A more robust model ran on all positives could improve performance overal.