3 ms·
Not sure I've seen a HN post before where so many people in the comments have clearly not read the article. Not even the summary of key points right at the top.
by mcjiggerlog 6y ago
Not sure I've seen a HN post before where so many people in the comments have clearly not read the article. Not even the summary of key points right at the top.
The piece is not anti-nuclear.
Also, risk is not binary. Finding out the true risk of something does not mean it's high risk and therefore negative. You can assess the risk of something and conclude that the risk is low and generally overblown, which is the point of the article.
- indymike 6y agoPerhaps because you have to have a Medium account to read the article? I'd love to read it, but I don't love the idea of logging in to Medium to do so.
- tester756 6y agoI don't have account and I could read it, weird.
- wozer 6y agoI can read it without an account. Maybe try incognito mode.
- Factfull 6y agoNo accounted needed for me.
- Melting_Harps 6y ago> Perhaps because you have to have a Medium account to read the article? I'm anti-Nuclear (On Earth), but would prefer most people read it before commenting on it. So, I archived it. http://archive.vn/OmALl http://archive.vn/OmALl
- kernaussage 6y agoJust clear your medium cookies, there is a limit on how many articles you can read per month.