No one claimed GPT3 is an AGI. Why does this article carry such a dismissive and disappointed tone? Perhaps the authors were offended that they were not given a

No one claimed GPT3 is an AGI. Why does this article carry such a dismissive and disappointed tone? Perhaps the authors were offended that they were not given access and wanted to "expose" GPT3's flaws? We should celebrate GPT3 for the achievement that it is: A big step in a promising direction.