In this case it's not distinctive in character so they should actually loose the trademark on "minimal fruit emblem with leaf to the side". Apple is arbitrary i

In this case it's not distinctive in character so they should actually loose the trademark on "minimal fruit emblem with leaf to the side". Apple is arbitrary in this case https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_distinctiveness#Arbitrary_marks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_distinctiveness#Arbi... they shouldn't be able to prohibit apple sellers to use apple as their logo or for that matter anyone else unrelated. edit: it appears that Apple lawyers never tasted pears and think it's the same thing