yikes. "Not injecting people with a drug without their consent" is not the equivalent of "let criminals run amok." I have trouble reconciling the notion that

yikes. "Not injecting people with a drug without their consent" is not the equivalent of "let criminals run amok." I have trouble reconciling the notion that after someone has been restrained to the point where it is considered safe to inject them with a drug, they find it necessary to inject a drug for the purpose of restraint. It's a bit like placing your knee on the back of someone's neck who is already handcuffed and crying for his mother. Unnecessary, cruel, and dangerous.