3 ms·
From a security perspective I think this results from a single person being able to act unchecked. Reminds me of the McDonald's game system cheat in which a sin
by TwoBit 6y ago
From a security perspective I think this results from a single person being able to act unchecked. Reminds me of the McDonald's game system cheat in which a single person controlled the entire country's game pieces unchecked.
- foreigner 6y agoAgreed. The article describes it as "defense in depth" but then goes on to say that one person held all the keys. That's negligence on the part of the library and their reputation should rightly suffer for it.
- dreamcompiler 6y agoThe McDonald's system had ostensible two-person control. It failed because the second person was a woman who could not follow her male partner into the restroom. The Carnegie Library didn't seem to even have ostensible two-person control.