3 ms·
Yes, I don't think it needed to be in the title of the article. That was just click-bait on the part of the NYT. However its fine to mention it. If his work wa
by phatfish 6y ago
Yes, I don't think it needed to be in the title of the article. That was just click-bait on the part of the NYT.
However its fine to mention it. If his work was made popular by angry men trying to get laid then that's how it happened.
I did think he sounded exactly like the type Joe Rogan would go off the deep end with, sure enough half way through he says he is going to California to try and get on Joe's podcast, lol.
Reading it there is something to underlying premise that how the jaw is used is reflected in how it develops physically. That makes logical sense. Whether any of treatments he recommends work seems to be very much unproven.