3 ms·
Agree with you and fluffything entirely. I can't believe this is an argument - it's basic logic. That the "rust community" can't see this is absolutely WILD.
by tonyhb 6y ago
Agree with you and fluffything entirely. I can't believe this is an argument - it's basic logic. That the "rust community" can't see this is absolutely WILD.
1) C++ may be unsafe
2) The rust bindings are safe
3) But the rust bindings call potentially unsafe C++
Yet... it's controversial to want unsafe{}? unsafe{} is there SO THAT YOU KNOW that the rust compiler can't assert soundness.
Absolutely bananas.
- Jweb_Guru 6y agoIt's not the case that "the Rust community" can't see this, and the fact that there's a huge amount of disagreement in this thread should be evidence of that. Ultimately, the problem is being resolved to everyone's satisfaction, which means that the discussion was productive, so I don't see the point in antagonizing people about whether they personally think it's an issue or not.