3 ms·
But this isn't pointing to a fundamental limitation of statistical models, only a limitation of the text corpus. If you had a billion pages of text written abou
by hackinthebochs 6y ago
But this isn't pointing to a fundamental limitation of statistical models, only a limitation of the text corpus. If you had a billion pages of text written about some town and the text included descriptions of travel distances and locations, the model should eventually develop a good representation of the town and relative locations. But of course without such a seed of spatial information, it will just make up plausible data. A human would behave similarly when forced to write a story while lacking critical information.
>Statistical approach to such problems is dumb.
Well, expecting your model to extract a spatial representation of the world from text is a dumb approach indeed. We interact with the spatial information much more directly. But our ability to navigate is fundamentally just a process of capturing regularities in our sensory input.
- ClumsyPilot 6y agoThe statistical argument has limitations, for instance, when there are more pieces of data to record than there are atoms in the universe. Then it falls firmly into impossible category. > But our ability to navigate is fundamentally just a process of capturing regularities in our sensory input. i don't think this is true at all, many animals have dedicated 'hardware' for navigation that can sense magnetic fields, etc. We seem to be born with spatial awareness that is far beyond what GPT will ever be capable of.