I'm observing this discussion as an outsider and can't help but wonder: maybe this could be solved by renaming the macro in question so that it contains "unsafe

I'm observing this discussion as an outsider and can't help but wonder: maybe this could be solved by renaming the macro in question so that it contains "unsafe" in its name? Whoever invokes the macro asserts that doing so is sound / cannot cause UB, and having "unsafe" in the macro name draws attention to that in the same way that the unsafe keyword itself does.