> The author basically says "XUL was too vulnerable to security problems and crashes" but why couldn't it be left in? There's an entire section called "The pro

> The author basically says "XUL was too vulnerable to security problems and crashes" but why couldn't it be left in? There's an entire section called "The problems with XUL" that attempts to respond to this question (and another one called "The problems with XPCOM"). Do you feel anything is missing in either section?