7 ms·
I say this with all seriousness, the main flaw I see is the models not accounting for the levels of voter suppression being applied this year. One party is on
by BoiledCabbage 6y ago
I say this with all seriousness, the main flaw I see is the models not accounting for the levels of voter suppression being applied this year.
One party is on record as saying that their own successful efforts in voter suppression last election won them the rust belt and as a result the presidency.
After seeing it being so successful at tipping the scales last time it appears it will be even more heavily relied on this year.
There are the most recent familiar hints in the news regarding mail in ballots, but so many more examples since the overturning of the voting rights act. How this isn't more of a scandal our democracy is frankly shocking.
It's extremely difficult to talk about this in a purely non-partisan way because there really a case of "both sides are doing it". One party is effectively utilizing this to obtain, maintain and increase their hold on govt positions.
> None of this is a coincidence. Republicans responded to the election of Barack Obama in 2008 not by trying to broaden their own base or appeal to a changing nation, but by modernizing voter suppression tactics out of the old Jim Crow playbook.
Chief Justice John Roberts’s shameful 5-4 decision in 2013’s Shelby County v Holder ripped the heart out of the prime enforcement mechanism of the Voting Rights Act. Roberts argued that the South had changed, and such protections were no longer necessary. 1965, Roberts suggested, was a long time ago, in a different nation, across a changed South. The tens of thousands of Georgians whose voting precincts were closed, forcing them to endure six-hour lines to vote during a pandemic would like a word with him Roberts’s calamitous ignorance has done grievous damage.
"Crosscheck" app/system which is frequently run against democratic counties was found to have a 200 to 1 false positive to true negative rate. It's still being heavily pushed.
> Crosscheck is a national database designed to check for voters who are registered in more than one state by comparing names and dates of birth. Researchers at Stanford University, the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Microsoft found that for every legitimate instance of double registration it finds, Crosscheck's algorithm returns approximately 200 false positives.[108] Kobach has been repeatedly sued by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other civil rights organizations for trying to restrict voting rights in Kansas.
> Often, voter fraud is cited as a justification for such measures, even when the incidence of voter fraud is low. In Iowa, lawmakers passed a strict voter ID law with the potential to disenfranchise 260,000 voters. Out of 1.6 million votes cast in Iowa in 2016, there were only 10 allegations of voter fraud; none were cases of impersonation that a voter ID law could have prevented. Only one person, a Republican voter, was convicted. Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate, the architect of the bill, admitted, "We've not experienced widespread voter fraud in Iowa."
We're reaching a very concerning threshold of election integrity that is being under appreciated. Our image of ourselves versus our reality is starting to diverge drastically.
https://time.com/5852837/voter-suppression-obstacles-just-america/ https://time.com/5852837/voter-suppression-obstacles-just-am...
https://www.npr.org/2018/10/23/659784277/republican-voter-suppression-efforts-are-targeting-minorities-journalist-says https://www.npr.org/2018/10/23/659784277/republican-voter-su...
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/us/some-republicans-acknowledge-leveraging-voter-id-laws-for-political-gain.html https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/us/some-republicans-ackno...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_suppression_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_suppression_in_the_Unite...
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/08/new-postal-service-plan-is-setting-off-election-alarms/amp https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/08/new-postal-service-p...
- tinalumfoil 6y agoSaying Republicans responded to so sonething by having John Roberts vote a certain way in the Supreme Court shows an ignorance of how the court works.
- IfOnlyYouKnew 6y agoOP does not say that Roberts itself was part of that "response", but that the decision enabled it.
- BoiledCabbage 6y agoI believe there was a much clearer more charitable reading of the above than assuming the person posting doesn't understand the difference between a political party and a Supreme Court. There was a action. That action was a effective repeal of the voting rights act. The Supreme Court performed that action. A political party responded to that act by rolling back voting rights.
- tinalumfoil 6y agoWhile this is a possible interpretation the paragraph puts a lot of weight on the supreme court decision and doesn't seem to mention any legislative or executive decisions that were enabled by the court.
- jl6 6y ago> on record as saying that their own successful efforts in voter suppression last election won them the rust belt and as a result the presidency Do you have a link to the record where that party says this?
- IfOnlyYouKnew 6y ago"‘It was great’: In leaked audio, Trump hailed low Black turnout in 2016": https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/21/trump-black-voters-turnout-2016-398520 https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/21/trump-black-voters-...