> all emails be written assuming that they could be made public That's not what I meant though. I meant that the emails were making arguments specifically targ

> all emails be written assuming that they could be made public That's not what I meant though. I meant that the emails were making arguments specifically targeted at the public and/or the courts. If you viewed the emails as Epic and Apple having a conversation with each other and trying to negotiate or convince the other, they'd be totally ridiculous. Epic made a jerk cold opening, and Apple gave a pointless lecture in response. This wasn't a conversation, it was a debate. The emails were essentially opening arguments in a court case.