> You seem to imply that the activist/article is lying. That's completely false. I said there is likely more to the story than was reported - and there is mor

> You seem to imply that the activist/article is lying. That's completely false. I said there is likely more to the story than was reported - and there is more to the story. I did not say that the activist or article is lying. That is solely your inference. The article, however, is incomplete and inaccurate. This particular activist has a long history with MPD. Two years ago, he was involed with a lawsuit against MPD. This house belongs to his grandmother, so he wasn't specifically being surveiled. The police have arrested his cousin and non-related drug-dealers while at his grandmother's house - in possession of drugs. They also served papers at that address for another one of his cousins for aggravated assault. As I wrote, there is more to this story than is written in this article. At best, this article was superficial. > Apart from the video and that there being no good reason for him to lie Yes, there are resaons for him to lie, but I didn't sat that he lied - I don't know whether he lied or not. But, why did he jump to the conclusion that MPD was surveiling him, personally, at an address that isn't his? This is the website that he has had for years for his activism. It's been completely empty for years. http://15.org http://15.org > Your assertion that this is likely a skycop seems to however not based on any evidence. I said based upon the thousands of already deployed skycops, the camera used by MPD, that if this was by MPD my understanding was that this was a Skycop camera.