4 ms·
>> Unless actor 2 is both a) selling at less than cost and b) either a de-facto monopoly supplier or is acting in concert with most other significant suppliers,
by icelancer 6y ago
>> Unless actor 2 is both a) selling at less than cost and b) either a de-facto monopoly supplier or is acting in concert with most other significant suppliers, then there is no monopoly issue
Plenty of businesses have run into problems without doing this. You also use circular reasoning when saying there's no monopoly issue unless there's a monopoly issue.
- mannykannot 6y ago> You also use circular reasoning when saying there's no monopoly issue unless there's a monopoly issue. Your paraphrase is inaccurate. The point is that undercutting the opposition is not, in itself, monopolistic.