4 ms·
No. Most people just play Witcher 3 and never touch 1 and 2. You can pick up the story just fine, and 1+2 aren't remotely close wrt quality.
by the_duke 6y ago
No. Most people just play Witcher 3 and never touch 1 and 2.
You can pick up the story just fine, and 1+2 aren't remotely close wrt quality.
- fartcannon 6y agoI'd say Witcher 2 is at least close, just smaller and less refined. The potion system is significantly more interesting in my opinion. That said, 3 is a masterpiece.
- User23 6y agoEven the original Witcher game is solid and has some interesting systems for its time. I wouldn't recommend it though to anyone who doesn't have an absurd amount of free time, or a real passion for the characters. It's been really neat watching CD Projekt step up their game, as it were, over the years.
- RandoHolmes 6y agoWitcher 1 had some serious pacing issues, but I personally enjoyed it more than 2. 2 got too flash for me, whereas 1 was more about the characters and the story. But it most DEFINITELY had pacing issues around the swamp area.