I don't understand this naivete. https://www.indiatoday.in/news-analysis/story/china-national-intelligence-law-2017-authorise-companies-espionage-india-1705033

I don't understand this naivete. https://www.indiatoday.in/news-analysis/story/china-national-intelligence-law-2017-authorise-companies-espionage-india-1705033-2020-07-27 https://www.indiatoday.in/news-analysis/story/china-national... https://www.mannheimerswartling.se/globalassets/nyhetsbrev/msa_nyhetsbrev_national-intelligence-law_jan-19.pdf https://www.mannheimerswartling.se/globalassets/nyhetsbrev/m... Do we really believe because, "legally", the company is not in China, is not subject to CCP control? It's not the law that binds them, it's party lines. If Bytedance is not subject to said control, why do they ban content critical with China, knowing the possible backlash? https://www.vox.com/open-sourced/2019/12/16/21013048/tiktok-china-national-security-investigation https://www.vox.com/open-sourced/2019/12/16/21013048/tiktok-... US politicians’ concern over TikTok began with an investigation the Guardian published on September 25, which revealed leaked documents that showed TikTok instructing its moderators to censor videos that mentioned topics sensitive to the Communist Party of China: Tiananmen Square, Tibetan independence, and the religious group Falun Gong, for instance. The Guardian’s investigation came after the Washington Post noted that a search for Hong Kong-related topics on TikTok showed virtually zero content about the ongoing and widely publicized pro-democracy protests, which were a major topic on other social media sites at the time.