4 ms·
On the contrary: if recovery is cheaper, easier, and faster than prevention then why bother with prevention? If you think there's a 10% chance of incurring $1m
by aahortwwy 6y ago
On the contrary: if recovery is cheaper, easier, and faster than prevention then why bother with prevention?
If you think there's a 10% chance of incurring $1m in ransomware costs over the next 12 months, and reducing that probability to 5% will introduce an ongoing annual expense of $100,000 what's the sensible decision from a financial perspective?