2 ms·
Reminder that ASPI are not an independent think tank, they are funded by the US State Dept, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and a whole host of weapons manufacturers.
by DarthGhandi 6y ago
Reminder that ASPI are not an independent think tank, they are funded by the US State Dept, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and a whole host of weapons manufacturers.
I would really prefer to wait for the UN Human Rights commissioner to visit the region, but she still hasn't gone despite having an open invitation for over a year now.
June 2019: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-un-idUSKCN1TE12Q https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-un-idUSKCN1T...
Feb 2020: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-xinjiang-rights-idUSKCN20K1ZE https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-xinjiang-rights-idU...
Still no visit.
Prominent Australians On ASPI:
> Former NSW premier Bob Carr has accused it of pumping out a “one-sided, pro-American view of the world”. Veteran foreign editor Tony Walker has slammed its "dystopian worldview" which "leaves little room for viewing China as a potential partner". "It lacks integrity and brings shame to Australia," says retired former DFAT chief and ex-Qantas CEO John Menadue.
https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/the-think-tank-behind-australia-s-changing-view-of-china-20200131-p53wgp https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/the-think-tank-be...
- yorwba 6y agoI'm well aware that ASPI isn't an unbiased source... which is why I picked that quote, since it runs counter to their biases. (It also contradict the title of the report "Uyghurs for sale", since in a sale you'd expect the money to flow the other direction.) If two opposing propaganda machines agree on something, that doesn't necessarily make it true, but it's better than when only one of them says so.