5 ms·
You are telling me how things are, I stated how they should be. A criminal should give their consent if it is information otherwise considered private. A simpl
by badrabbit 6y ago
You are telling me how things are, I stated how they should be.
A criminal should give their consent if it is information otherwise considered private. A simple count of crimes by the police is implied. You draw the line when identifying information is collected and that individuals that are identified have not implicitly granted consent. If you are not sure, ask for consent
Let me use another analogy: If I am unsure a person has granted me permission to have sex with them, I should ask for consent. If I am unsure that they are of sound mind at the time, I wait until I am sure.
This is far from rape but the principle is the same. If you are unsure ask for consent. If you are not sure murderers mind counting of their crimes ask for consent (I think they'd love the publicity, I would personally be sure consent is implied).
Also, yes the law should be changed but we are talking ethics not law here,right?
- wolco 6y agoComing out and asking for sex or if consent is given might be culturely inappropiate for many. A common approach is to slowly work up to that point using body language to signal intent to proceed to the next level. On your other point collecting publically available information is legal now.. changing the law to require permission now brings in ownership. Who can grant permission.. should wildlife or objects be afforded the same protections?
- badrabbit 6y agoWildlife and objects can't give consent. We are talking ethics not law. The law allows a lot of unethical things. But if it were a law a lot would be determined by precedent , but some framework to criminally prosecute individuap and corporate stalkers would be great.