3 ms·
That'd place them at a slightly better position than AMD, that has been in the (discrete) GPU for years. All in all, this is still theoretical and we'll have to
by dr_zoidberg 6y ago
That'd place them at a slightly better position than AMD, that has been in the (discrete) GPU for years. All in all, this is still theoretical and we'll have to see how they behave under real workloads (be that games or compute).
Intels iGPUs have always looked great on paper and then hit a wall in the real world.
- ivalm 6y agoThe expectation is that the new Navi (which will come out probably earlier than xe-hpg) will be 80 cu [0], it is essentially 2x 5700XT [1]. This should put it in 15-20TFlop range, 1.5-2x Intel single tile. [0] https://www.pcgamesn.com/amd/big-navi-rdna2-80-cu-rumour https://www.pcgamesn.com/amd/big-navi-rdna2-80-cu-rumour [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_RX_5000_series https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_RX_5000_series
- dr_zoidberg 6y agoLately I've been more interested in CPU announcements and haven't been following GPUs pretty much at all (been super tired of all the hype around Ampere, that's been going on for months now). Considering that, it means Intel is coming in to the dGPU market with a not stellar device, which has historically had driver issues and underdelivered in practice... Even more pressure to prove their worth then.