3 ms·
I think it would be ok if they were charging for _some_ of the content. Docs could stay free and they could charge for development courses. They could even make
by jacekm 6y ago
I think it would be ok if they were charging for _some_ of the content. Docs could stay free and they could charge for development courses. They could even make introductory courses free and charge only for advanced topics.
Another example - browser compatibility matrices. They could be free just for the current versions of browsers and you'd have to pay for historical and future (i.e. development versions) data.
I think it's possible to find a balance between making the essential knowledge free so newcomers can join the industry and charging those who already have a source of income. I know that 5$/month can still be too much in some parts of the world, but this could be addressed with regional pricing.
- everybodyknows 6y agoYes, "freemium" -- that is the way. Another piece of content that could be premium at are the examples. Professional editors are necessary, to impose structure and standards, but as Stack overflow shows, technical knowledge contributions can be gotten for free with a bit of gamification.